In fact, Morris did not own slaves. Here was our response:
Your
letter raised two matters: one, how is it that a Constitution
that purports to describe a government that guarantees justice and liberty
could have resulted in a system that far too often has provided neither?. The
second, about slavery, is one that strikes all of us who compare the oratory of
the American Revolution with the perpetuation of slavery deliberately permitted
by the Constitution. The second question is the one
I'll address first.
It is a fact that some of the most
revered Founding Fathers (e.g., Jefferson, Madison) gave considerable lip
service to the principle that slavery was wrong, but continued to own slaves;
others made no such hypocritical assertions to try and disguise their embrace
of slavery; and others chose to ignore it in the interest of securing their own
measure of power in the new nation. When
it comes to Morris, however, there was no hypocrisy in his denunciation of the
institution. Before addressing his role
in designing the Constitution, I want to clear up a couple of things about him. Morris was born into a well-to-do family, and his father, an admiralty judge, owned at least forty, maybe more than sixty slaves. When the judge died in 1762, half of the
estate went to one of Gouverneur's half-brothers, and the remainder, including
the ancestral home, went to Morris's mother. Gouverneur received a relatively
small cash bequest. By the time his mother died in 1786, she had three slaves, and she
left them to Morris's sisters. Her half of Morrisania went to her stepson
Staats, and Gouverneur bought it from him in 1787.
Morris's
aversion to slavery was already evident in 1777 (he was 25), early in the
Revolutionary War, when he and John Jay were among those given the task of
drafting the first New York constitution. Morris unsuccessfully proposed a
provision recommending that future New York legislatures take steps to abolish domestic
slavery so that "every being who breathes the air of this State, shall
enjoy the privileges of a freeman." (The language called for a delay
because it was believed at that time that liberating the slaves in war time
would be dangerous.) He was, however,
successful in squashing an attempt by Jay (who opposed slavery but detested
Catholicism) to bar Catholics from voting unless they took an oath.
There is no indication that Morris had any slaves
before he left for Europe in late 1788. After he returned in late 1798, until
his death in 1816, his practice was, if he bought any -- he seems to have
bought two -- to immediately manumit them but bind them to indentures for a
period of time. He paid them wages,
which appear in his account books, and periodically hired free black men to work on the Morrisania farm.
The next post addresses Morris's actions at the Constitutional Convention regarding slavery.
PG SLOT ทุนน้อยก็รวยได้ แม้ว่าคุณจะมีทุนน้อย แต่อยากเล่นเกมสล็อตออนไลน์นั่นไม่อยากเลย เพราะในแต่รายการใช้เงินลงทุนน้อยมากถึงมากที่สุด pg slot ไม่ต้องลงทุนเยอะก็มีโอกาสรวยได้
ReplyDeletepg เกมสล็อต สนุกเหมือนกับ line tv เกมสล็อตของค่าย pg slot นั้นมีมากมาย ในเว็บของเรา ที่ pg-slot.game และรับรองว่าสนุกทุกเกม Line TV ในช่วงนี้แล้วอยากเปลี่ยนเราแนะนำ
ReplyDelete